Deliberately misleading America into war is reason for impeachment?
President Bush must be removed from office because he continues to report misleading words about our reason to go to war.
The news media reports, as if President Bush’s misleading words are of equal importance as the truth. The media appears to do this for no other reason then Bush is the President and what he says is “NEWS”. Therefore misleading words get repeated and facts don’t get repeated because it’s old information.
June 17, 2005, LA Times reports Page A-32:
White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan said. “Our troops understand the importance of completing the mission.”
Now I say those are the truly spoken words by McClellan but that doesn’t make the statement true.
If the troops believe that they are dieing to save America from future terrorist attacks, that doesn’t make there believes true. It only makes the troopers believes true in the troopers mind.
The fact that the “Downing Street Memos” are only making it to the main media outlets now is more reason to give facts AGAIN to the troops so they don’t need to kill and die because of President Bush’s misleading words.
The government controls the media by threats of arrest; here is an example of the government controls of the media as printed in the LA Times, page C-3 June 16, 2005, as reported by Reuters. On June 15, 2005, Federal agents arrested two executives of the Tribune Co. for fraud.
Now I say if federal agents came to my newspaper asking question about tax documents or other matters that might, hurt stock prices of the newspaper or myself, I would back off writing bad about the government.
If I was the President or even the Vice President and I was dealing with billions of dollars of oil money and world power, I would first make a plan to get the newspapers (or other world leaders like Thatcher’s Son, (see page A7, LA Times 1/14/05) or the President of the United Nations) in “trouble,” so when the war begins I can hold that “trouble” against the newspaper or Great Britain (see page A7, LA Times 1/14/05) and then latter, when I need support for the war, I got it.
To me that’s not a hard plan (Remember the President had the power of the government supported Think Tanks) to believe when one considers the reward of world power and little or no chace of being suspected, let-alone getting caught.
President Bush must be removed from office because he continues to report misleading words about our reason to go to war.
The news media reports, as if President Bush’s misleading words are of equal importance as the truth. The media appears to do this for no other reason then Bush is the President and what he says is “NEWS”. Therefore misleading words get repeated and facts don’t get repeated because it’s old information.
June 17, 2005, LA Times reports Page A-32:
White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan said. “Our troops understand the importance of completing the mission.”
Now I say those are the truly spoken words by McClellan but that doesn’t make the statement true.
If the troops believe that they are dieing to save America from future terrorist attacks, that doesn’t make there believes true. It only makes the troopers believes true in the troopers mind.
The fact that the “Downing Street Memos” are only making it to the main media outlets now is more reason to give facts AGAIN to the troops so they don’t need to kill and die because of President Bush’s misleading words.
The government controls the media by threats of arrest; here is an example of the government controls of the media as printed in the LA Times, page C-3 June 16, 2005, as reported by Reuters. On June 15, 2005, Federal agents arrested two executives of the Tribune Co. for fraud.
Now I say if federal agents came to my newspaper asking question about tax documents or other matters that might, hurt stock prices of the newspaper or myself, I would back off writing bad about the government.
If I was the President or even the Vice President and I was dealing with billions of dollars of oil money and world power, I would first make a plan to get the newspapers (or other world leaders like Thatcher’s Son, (see page A7, LA Times 1/14/05) or the President of the United Nations) in “trouble,” so when the war begins I can hold that “trouble” against the newspaper or Great Britain (see page A7, LA Times 1/14/05) and then latter, when I need support for the war, I got it.
To me that’s not a hard plan (Remember the President had the power of the government supported Think Tanks) to believe when one considers the reward of world power and little or no chace of being suspected, let-alone getting caught.
posted by Inheriting Syria at 2:55 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home